Thursday, January 24, 2013

Fw: Fwd: Good morning : have a foggy and long weekend


 

 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
===================
Please consider the environment before printing this email
===================

The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. NPCC is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
This Message has been scanned for viruses & found to be cleaned.


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Bill Gates and his use for money !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/bill-gates/9812672/Bill-Gates-interview-I-have-no-use-for-money.-This-is-Gods-work.html

Nice article - that I Cut and Paste here.

William Henry "Bill" Gates is a rich man. His estimated wealth, some 65  billion measured in US dollars, equals the annual GDP of Ecuador, and maybe a bit more than that of Croatia. By this rather crude criterion, the founder of Microsoft is worth two Kenyas, three Trinidads and a dozen or so Montenegros. Not bad for a university dropout.
Gates is also mortal, although some of his admirers may find that hard to believe, and as they say, there are no pockets in shrouds. So he is now engaged in the process of ridding himself of all that money in the hope of extending the lives of others less fortunate than himself.
"I'm certainly well taken care of in terms of food and clothes," he says, redundantly. "Money has no utility to me beyond a certain point. Its utility is entirely in building an organisation and getting the resources out to the poorest in the world."
That "certain point" is set a little higher than for the rest of us – Gates owns a lakeside estate in Washington State worth about $150 million (£94  million) and boasting a swimming pool equipped with an underwater music system – but one gets the point. Being rich, even on the cosmic scale attained by Bill Gates, is no guarantee of an enduring place in history. The projection of the personal computer into daily life should do the trick for him, but even at the age of 57 he is a restless man and wants something more. The "more" is the eradication of a disease that has blighted untold numbers of lives: polio.
Later this month, Gates will deliver the BBC's Dimbleby Lecture, taking as his theme the value of the young human being. Every child, he will say, has the right to a healthy and productive life, and he will explain how technology and innovation can help towards the attainment of that still-distant goal. Gates has put his money where his mouth is. He and his wife Melinda have so far given away $28 billion via their charitable foundation, more than $8  billion of it to improve global health.

"My wife and I had a long dialogue about how we were going to take the wealth that we're lucky enough to have and give it back in a way that's most impactful to the world," he says. "Both of us worked at Microsoft and saw that if you take innovation and smart people, the ability to measure what's working, that you can pull together some pretty dramatic things.
"We're focused on the help of the poorest in the world, which really drives you into vaccination. You can actually take a disease and get rid of it altogether, like we are doing with polio."
This has been done only once before in humans, with the eradication of smallpox in the 1970s.
"Polio's pretty special because once you get an eradication you no longer have to spend money on it; it's just there as a gift for the rest of time."
One can see why that appeals to Gates. He has always sought neat, definitive solutions to things, but as he knows from Microsoft, bugs are resilient things. The disease is still endemic in Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan, and killing it off altogether has been likened to squeezing jelly to death. There is another, sinister obstacle: the propagation by Islamist groups of the belief that polio vaccination is a front for covert sterilisation and other western evils. Health workers in Pakistan have paid with their lives for involvement in the programme.
"It's not going to stop us succeeding," says Gates. "It does force us to sit down with the Pakistan government to renew their commitments, see what they're going to do in security and make changes to protect the women who are doing God's work and getting out to these children and delivering the vaccine."
Gates does not usually speak in religious terms, and has traditionally danced around the issue of God. His wife, a Roman Catholic, is less defensive on that topic but ploughs her own furrow, encouraging contraception when necessary, in contradiction to teaching from Rome.
"Melinda and I had been talking about this even before we were married," he says. "When I was in my 40s Microsoft was my primary activity. The big switch for me was when I decided to make the foundation my primary purpose. It was a big change, although there are more in common with the two things than you might think – meeting with scientists, taking on tough challenges, people being sceptical that you can get things done."
Gates is still chairman of Microsoft but without his day-to-day attention it has taken on the appearance of a weary giant, trailing Apple and Google in innovation. Some have called for Gates's return to the company full-time to inject some verve but he isn't coming back.
"My full-time work for the rest of my life will be at the foundation," he says. "I still work part-time for Microsoft. I've had two careers and I'm lucky that both of them have been quite amazing.
"I loved my Microsoft: it prepared me for what I'm doing now. In the same way that I got to see the PC and internet revolutions, now I see child death rates coming down. I work very long hours and try to learn as much as I can about these things, but that's because I enjoy it."
He emphasises that the foundation's effort is part of a global campaign in which governments must play the lead role.
"The scale of the (foundation's) wealth compared to government budgets is actually not that large, and compared to the scale of some of these problems. But I do feel lucky that substantial resources are going back to make the world a more habitable place."
In 1990 some 12 million children under the age of five died. The figure today is about seven million, or 19,000 per day. According to the United Nations, the leading causes of death are pneumonia (18 per cent), pre-birth complications (14 per cent), diarrhoea (11 per cent), complications during birth (nine per cent) and malaria (seven per cent). For Gates, though, polio is a totem. The abolition of the disease will be a headline-grabber, spurring countries on to greater efforts. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will spend $1.8 billion in the next six years to accomplish that goal, almost a third of the global effort.
"All you need is over 90 per cent of children to have the vaccine drop three times and the disease stops spreading. The number of cases eventually goes to zero. When we started, we had over 400,000 children a year being paralysed and we are now down to under 1,000 cases a year. The great thing about finishing polio is that we'll have resources to get going on malaria and measles."
Gates is no saint. He could be an intimidating boss at Microsoft and his company became notorious for using its clout to reinforce its dominance in the market place, at the expense of smaller rivals. Still, he and his wife are showing generosity on a staggering scale, a counterblast to the endemic greed of the Nineties and early Noughties, and they have convinced others that mega-philanthropy is the way of the future. That wily investor, Warren Buffett, has so far given away $17.5 billion via the Gates Foundation.
The children of Bill and Melinda Gates will never know poverty. They may not become multibillionaires but even the loss to charity of the vast bulk of their parents' fortune should leave them with a billion or so each.
Gates explains: "The vast majority of the wealth, over 95 per cent, goes to the foundation, which will spend all that money within 20 years after neither of us are around any more."
So, is it about some new-found faith, all this giving?
"It doesn't relate to any particular religion; it's about human dignity and equality," he says. "The golden rule that all lives have equal value and we should treat people as we would like to be treated."
The 37th Dimbleby Lecture will be broadcast on BBC One on Jan 29

Sunday, January 20, 2013

why should we adopt the GM crops.


 

If we are to feed an ever-growing population and save India from starving, we must embrace GM crops

Malcolm Elliott Jan 16, 2013, 12.00AM IST
Tags:
In October 2012, a Technical Expert Committee (TEC) appointed by the Supreme Court (SC) of India recommended a 10-year ban on field trials of genetically engineered (GM) food crops. Admirers of Indian agriculture's colossal achievements were shocked and saddened by the news.
The committee ignored copious data on the safety and efficacy of GM crops in coming to this blinkered recommendation which is not in the best interests of the people. It prevents the provision of a safety net for the ever-increasing population. However, there is some hope since, on November 9, the SC declined to accept the recommendations of the TEC, pending receipt of a more comprehensive report.
Knowledge of the nightmare period in India which led up to the publication of Paul Ehrlich's book The Population Bomb leads one to be profoundly shocked by the TEC recommendations. In that book Ehrlich wrote, "The battle to save humanity is over...In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programmes embarked upon now." Ehrlich insisted that India couldn't possibly feed 200 million more people by 1980.
That Ehrlich was wrong was largely due to the efforts of three men. Norman Borlaug was concerned about population growth too, but he decided that the best way to stop people starving would be to help them to produce more food. Now famous as the father of the Green Revolution, Borlaug worked with M S Swaminathan, with vigorous support from the then minister for food and agriculture C Subramaniam, to breed high-yielding cereal crops and deliver other innovations which enabled India to dramatically increase agricultural productivity. From 1960 to 2000 the Green Revolution increased India's wheat yields more than threefold.
The Green Revolution saved the lives of one billion people who would otherwise have starved, and Borlaug received the 1970 Nobel peace prize in recognition of his success. Although Borlaug died in 2009, his work is not over; in October 2011 the world's popu-lation reached seven billion, some 1.2 billion of whom are hungry. Each year nine million people die because of hunger and malnutrition (one every 3.5 seconds); five million are children.
The task of feeding the world will be even more difficult in years to come. By 2050 the world's popu-lation will exceed nine billion, and combined environmental crises mean that we must produce much more food on less land with less water, fewer agrochemicals and less fossil fuel, while still maintaining biodiversity. Meanwhile, farming must adapt to changing climate zones and weather patterns. To do all this we must heed Borlaug's plea to deploy the full range of cutting-edge techniques to produce higher yielding, higher quality, lower input and lower environmental impact crops.
Borlaug highlighted gene manipulation approaches that are delivering results faster and more precisely than the classical crop breeding techniques. The TEC recommendations would prevent these approaches from being brought to the service of the people of India.
Clive James has illustrated the benefits that GM crops have already delivered to India. He noted that GM (Bt) Cotton has brought spectacular benefits to India's farmers and to the nation's economy. Seven million small farmers planted 10.6 million hectares of Bt cotton in 2011. Average cotton yield and production increased from 13.6 million bales in 2002 to 35.5 million bales in 2011. Bt cotton contributed $9.4 billion to the farm economy from 2002 to 2010 and $2.5 billion in 2010 alone. India could and should continue to lead the way forward so that the 'Gene Revolution' can deliver the full benefits of higher yield, higher quality, lower input, lower environmental impact crops that humanity so urgently needs.
Borlaug spent his last years campaigning to protect agricultural innovations like GM from being derailed by activists who oppose genetic engineering for ideological reasons. In 2004 he warned that success for the anti-GM lobby would be catastrophic: "If the naysayers manage to stop agricultural biotechnology, they will precipitate the famines and the crisis of global biodiversity they have been predicting."
Today, i am deeply distressed that in spite of the unqualified success of, for example, GM cotton here in India, anti-biotechnology groups have continued to make outrageous claims in their war on the use of the technology. They have falsely linked GM crops to health problems and to supposed economic failures, wilfully ignoring the fact that the safety of each GM product is rigorously scrutinised throughout its development period.
Regards,
Shashi

Chetan Bhagat's artlcle on TOI

Dear change seekers,

In recent weeks you have worked hard to make India a safer place. The recent Delhi gang-rape case dominated headlines and received world-wide attention, mainly due to your efforts. However, be mindful of certain worrisome negative aspects of this outrage. What you stand for is worthwhile, justified and necessary. However, the way you are going about it is not. You may create a lot of noise, but not the desired change. It is important to understand India first.

India, no matter what your Civics teacher told you, is not an equal country. India is divided into four classes with different levels of power. For simplicity, let us call these classes the Ones, Twos, Threes and Fours (deliberately avoiding upper-lower classification).

The Ones are our political masters. They control India, primarily through control over land, resources and laws that govern us. They don't directly own assets, but control the asset owners, the Twos.

The Twos are our industrialists and capitalists. These Twos help secure and increase the power of the Ones. Business magazines honour them with terms like 'the dynamic entrepreneurs of a new liberalized India'. While some may deserve such accolades, most don't. Twos become big because they serve the Ones well. The Ones allow the Twos to become rich through limited competition and tightly regulated approvals. Real estate, mining, infrastructure or most other sectors, no company in India can thrive without support of the political class.

The next class, the Threes, are people like you and me, the primary readers of this newspaper. We are people with a certain amount of affluence and education, comprising around 10 per cent of India's population. While life is a struggle for many Threes, they do have a basic standard of living and a modest access to opportunities. However, the Threes still do not get speedy justice, accountable leaders or a protective police force.

Notably, Threes have recently acquired a new media power. Threes are affluent and buy things advertisers want to sell. Hence, the media caters to Threes. The Threes dominate social media too. Whatever trends on social media, makes its way to the evening news. This power to dictate the news and influence public sentiment is real and substantial.

The Delhi gang rape victim was a Three, and the gruesome case made the rest of the Threes feel vulnerable like never before. The Threes wanted the rape to be debated. Hence, for almost a month little else could be discussed in a country of 1.2 billion people. However, in the process, the Threes might have done some damage. For despite the well-intentioned outcry, the Threes inadvertently displayed they care about themselves much more than another huge class they alienated, the Fours.

The Fours are the ninety of the country, people with limited education, abysmal standards of living and little hope for a better future. The Fours are our farmers, slum dwellers, domestic helpers and the hundreds of millions of Indians without proper healthcare, education and infrastructure. These Fours get no debates on TV. People won't protest for them on India Gate.

The Threes either shun them, or impose their newfound modern values on them. For example, Fours may see women-men relationships in a regressive way, borne out by centuries of cultural indoctrination. The Threes, exposed to the latest Western beliefs, will mock them.

If you noticed the various debates and opinions on the case, the Threes only accepted ideas in line with their own liberal, modern value system. Nobody could dare say anything even slightly alternative or stress on the Indian reality without being ridiculed, mocked and being termed a perpetrator of rapes.

The Threes found a new power, but used it like the Ones and Twos use theirs --  for self-serving purposes.

For will we ever passionately discuss the issues and lend our media power to issues that affect the Fours? Will we go to India Gate to help slum dwellers get proper drinking water, for instance? Did we care about the other Indians' news in the past month?

As we alienate the Fours, we leave them open to be exploited by the Ones. The Ones echo the sentiments of the Fours and throw some scraps at them. In return, the Fours ignore the Ones' misdeeds and bring them back to power. Meanwhile, we Threes keep screaming and watch our own self-created reality show.

This is no way to create a revolution, or even change. We have to take the grassroots Fours along. We cannot bully people into agreeing with our views. If we want people to change, we should not mock or deride. Instead listen and understand first and slowly nudge people towards change. Don't just laugh at anyone who says women should cover up and not venture out at night. Suggest that while this old belief may come from a place of practical reality, this lets the perpetrators off the hook and so cannot be the primary solution. I am not saying these people are not regressive. However, if you want change, be inclusive.

Threes should also lend their media power to support issues affecting the Fours. India's poor are a not separate species from us. They are Indians who deserve a better standard of living. If the politicians didn't protect the Twos so much, we could open the economy further, truly liberalize and create a lot of opportunity.

Let us fight for the Fours too. They will join us, and make us a truly politically relevant force. This way, we will be able to take on the ultimate power abusers in India – the Ones and the Twos. And then, and only then is when true change will happen.
 
Regards,
Shashi

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Fw: Fwd: JUST A PENCIL!!!

 
Regards,
Shashi
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: satya srinivas <kushi424@yahoo.com>
To: arati suresh <asuresh23@gmail.com>; shashi <kiranshash@yahoo.com>; shyamala ganesh <shyganesh@yahoo.co.in>; rajini rajani ramkumar <casaflora@yahoo.com>; Veena Harish <veeshahar@yahoo.com>; kamala vijayan <vijayanfamily@gmail.com>; Mohini Varghese <mohini.varghese@gmail.com>; jaganmayi himamshu <jaganmayi@gmail.com>; Smitha Varghese <smit.varghese@gmail.com>; "brindaprasanna@yahoo.com" <brindaprasanna@yahoo.com>; "jyoti_himu@yahoo.co.in" <jyoti_himu@yahoo.co.in>; Shilpa Bagamane <shilpabagamane@gmail.com>; Rajani Ramakumar <srrajani@gmail.com>; Sindhu Shivapuja <sindhu.shivapuja@gmail.com>; mollamma peter <merinpeter07@gmail.com>; Shilpa Bagamane <shimmer78@rediffmail.com>; Ravi Kiran <rkiran3@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: JUST A PENCIL!!!


 
satya
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Preethi Murthy <preethimurthy@hotmail.com>
To: Satyasrinivas <kushi424@yahoo.com>; NAM MURTHY <murthy_nam@yahoo.co.in>; Twisha Noronha <twishadsilva@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:38 AM
Subject: Fwd: JUST A PENCIL!!!


 
BE SURE TO READ THE PARABLE AT THE END !!!  You will need to scroll over to the right to see all the pictures.
 































 A PENCIL MAKER TOLD THE PENCIL 5 IMPORTANT LESSONS JUST BEFORE PUTTING IT IN THE BOX :

1.) EVERYTHING YOU DO WILL ALWAYS LEAVE A MARK .


2.) YOU CAN ALWAYS CORRECT THE MISTAKES YOU MAKE.

3.) WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS WHAT IS INSIDE OF YOU.

4.) IN LIFE , YOU WILL UNDERGO PAINFUL SHARPENINGS, WHICH WILL ONLY MAKE YOU BETTER.

5.) TO BE THE BEST PENCIL, YOU MUST ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE HELD AND GUIDED BY THE HAND THAT HOLDS YOU.



We all need to be constantly sharpened.  This parable may encourage you to know that you are a special person, with unique God-given talents and abilities.  Only you can fulfill the purpose which you were born to accomplish.  Never allow yourself to get discouraged and think that your life is insignificant and cannot be changed and, like the pencil, always remember that the most important part of who you are, is what's inside of you and then allow yourself to be guided by the hand of God.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





 
 
 
-- V. Mantripragada 1109 Experiment Street University of Georgia Griffin, GA 30223 770 228 7336 (Phone) 770 228 7271(Fax)


Fw: BBC E-mail: Swami Vivekananda, the yoga missionary

 
Regards,
Shashi
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: satya srinivas <kushi424@yahoo.com>
To: shashi <kiranshash@yahoo.com>; shyamala ganesh <shyganesh@yahoo.co.in>; Veena Harish <veeshahar@yahoo.com>; Shilpa Bagamane <shilpabagamane@gmail.com>; Preethi Murthy <preethimurthy@hotmail.com>; Shilpa Bagamane <shimmer78@rediffmail.com>; Ravi Kiran <rkiran3@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:19 PM
Subject: Fw: BBC E-mail: Swami Vivekananda, the yoga missionary


 
satya
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Jaganmayi <jhimamshu@yahoo.co.in>
To: Jyothi Himamshu <jyothi_himu@yahoo.co.in>; Varun Himamshu <spacetrucker23@gmail.com>; appa himamshu <himamshu_jyothi@yahoo.co.in>; satyakka <kushi424@yahoo.com>; doddhappa <nnprasanna@hotmail.com>; Brinda Prasanna <brindaprasanna@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 6:19 PM
Subject: BBC E-mail: Swami Vivekananda, the yoga missionary

I saw this story on the BBC News iPhone App and thought you should see it.



** Swami Vivekananda, the yoga missionary **
Emily Buchanan explains her connection to one of India's most influential spiritual teachers - Swami Vivekananda.
< http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21045281 >


** Disclaimer **
The BBC is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.


Jag Himamshu